UT vs Compass Which Is More Reliable?
UT and Compass stocks are two popular investment options for individuals looking to diversify their portfolio. UT stocks are known for their stability and consistent returns, making them a reliable choice for investors seeking long-term growth. On the other hand, Compass stocks are considered more volatile but offer the potential for higher returns in a shorter period. Both options have their own unique benefits and risks, making it important for investors to carefully consider their financial goals before making a decision.
UT or Compass?
When comparing UT and Compass, different investors may prioritize various metrics based on their investment strategies and goals. So, ask yourself what type of investor you are. This will guide you in determining which metrics are most important for your investment decision between UT and Compass.
Dividend Investors:
Dividend investors look for stable and growing income streams, using dividend metrics to assess potential investments. A company's dividend yield essentially measures the size of its dividend relative to the total market value of the company.
UT has a dividend yield of 3.59%, while Compass has a dividend yield of -%. Beyond the yield itself, considering the growth and sustainability of these dividends is also crucial. UT reports a 5-year dividend growth of 0.00% year and a payout ratio of 0.00%. On the other hand, Compass reports a 5-year dividend growth of 0.00% year and a payout ratio of -14.93%.
Value Investors:
Value investors focus on financial metrics to determine a stock's intrinsic value compared to its market value. The Price-to-Earnings (P/E) Ratio links stock price to a company's earnings per share, with UT P/E ratio at 11.37 and Compass's P/E ratio at -17.41. Another crucial valuation metric is the Price-to-Book (P/B) Ratio, which compares stock price with book value per share. UT P/B ratio is 3.08 while Compass's P/B ratio is 8.04.
Growth Investors:
Growth investors prioritize metrics indicative of a company's expansion potential. Focusing on top-line growth, UT has seen a 5-year revenue growth of 0.68%, while Compass's is 3.20%. Return on Equity (ROE) measures how effectively a company uses equity investment to generate earnings, with UT's ROE at 28.80% and Compass's ROE at -49.85%.
Retail Investors:
Retail investors often consider stock affordability and company familiarity. For example, day low prices are ¥2667.00 for UT and $6.59 for Compass. Over the past year, UT's prices ranged from ¥1870.00 to ¥3770.00, with a yearly change of 101.60%. Compass's prices fluctuated between $1.88 and $7.01, with a yearly change of 272.87%. Brand recognition also plays a role, as familiarity with a company can influence investment decisions.