Suzuki vs Mitsubishi Which Is Stronger?

Suzuki and Mitsubishi are two well-known Japanese automobile manufacturers that have been competing in the market for decades. Both companies have iconic models and a loyal customer base. Their stocks have also been closely watched by investors, who are constantly comparing their performance and growth potential. This comparison between Suzuki and Mitsubishi stocks involves analyzing various factors such as financial health, market share, innovation, and competitive advantages. Ultimately, investors need to carefully consider these aspects before making any investment decisions in either company.

Suzuki or Mitsubishi?

When comparing Suzuki and Mitsubishi, different investors may prioritize various metrics based on their investment strategies and goals. So, ask yourself what type of investor you are. This will guide you in determining which metrics are most important for your investment decision between Suzuki and Mitsubishi.

Dividend Investors:

Dividend investors look for stable and growing income streams, using dividend metrics to assess potential investments. A company's dividend yield essentially measures the size of its dividend relative to the total market value of the company. Suzuki has a dividend yield of 2.43%, while Mitsubishi has a dividend yield of 3.25%. Beyond the yield itself, considering the growth and sustainability of these dividends is also crucial. Suzuki reports a 5-year dividend growth of 20.11% year and a payout ratio of 0.00%. On the other hand, Mitsubishi reports a 5-year dividend growth of 7.47% year and a payout ratio of 28.95%.

Value Investors:

Value investors focus on financial metrics to determine a stock's intrinsic value compared to its market value. The Price-to-Earnings (P/E) Ratio links stock price to a company's earnings per share, with Suzuki P/E ratio at 11.84 and Mitsubishi's P/E ratio at 11.12. Another crucial valuation metric is the Price-to-Book (P/B) Ratio, which compares stock price with book value per share. Suzuki P/B ratio is 1.08 while Mitsubishi's P/B ratio is 1.16.

Growth Investors:

Growth investors prioritize metrics indicative of a company's expansion potential. Focusing on top-line growth, Suzuki has seen a 5-year revenue growth of 0.05%, while Mitsubishi's is 2.10%. Return on Equity (ROE) measures how effectively a company uses equity investment to generate earnings, with Suzuki's ROE at 9.50% and Mitsubishi's ROE at 11.09%.

Retail Investors:

Retail investors often consider stock affordability and company familiarity. For example, day low prices are ¥1792.00 for Suzuki and $17.50 for Mitsubishi. Over the past year, Suzuki's prices ranged from ¥1077.00 to ¥1973.00, with a yearly change of 83.19%. Mitsubishi's prices fluctuated between $14.68 and $24.52, with a yearly change of 67.03%. Brand recognition also plays a role, as familiarity with a company can influence investment decisions.