SU vs ATS Which Is More Reliable?

SU (Suncor Energy Inc.) and ATS (ATS Automation Tooling Systems Inc.) are two prominent Canadian companies operating in different sectors. SU is a major player in the energy industry, particularly in oil sands, while ATS specializes in automation solutions for various industries. Both companies have a strong presence in the market and offer potential investment opportunities for shareholders. In this analysis, we will compare SU and ATS stocks in terms of their financial performance, growth prospects, and overall investment potential.

SU or ATS?

When comparing SU and ATS, different investors may prioritize various metrics based on their investment strategies and goals. So, ask yourself what type of investor you are. This will guide you in determining which metrics are most important for your investment decision between SU and ATS.

Dividend Investors:

Dividend investors look for stable and growing income streams, using dividend metrics to assess potential investments. A company's dividend yield essentially measures the size of its dividend relative to the total market value of the company. SU has a dividend yield of -%, while ATS has a dividend yield of -%. Beyond the yield itself, considering the growth and sustainability of these dividends is also crucial. SU reports a 5-year dividend growth of 0.00% year and a payout ratio of 0.00%. On the other hand, ATS reports a 5-year dividend growth of 0.00% year and a payout ratio of 0.00%.

Value Investors:

Value investors focus on financial metrics to determine a stock's intrinsic value compared to its market value. The Price-to-Earnings (P/E) Ratio links stock price to a company's earnings per share, with SU P/E ratio at 15.38 and ATS's P/E ratio at 39.76. Another crucial valuation metric is the Price-to-Book (P/B) Ratio, which compares stock price with book value per share. SU P/B ratio is 1.67 while ATS's P/B ratio is 2.65.

Growth Investors:

Growth investors prioritize metrics indicative of a company's expansion potential. Focusing on top-line growth, SU has seen a 5-year revenue growth of -0.94%, while ATS's is 1.30%. Return on Equity (ROE) measures how effectively a company uses equity investment to generate earnings, with SU's ROE at 13.36% and ATS's ROE at 7.32%.

Retail Investors:

Retail investors often consider stock affordability and company familiarity. For example, day low prices are $1.51 for SU and $31.59 for ATS. Over the past year, SU's prices ranged from $0.98 to $5.86, with a yearly change of 497.35%. ATS's prices fluctuated between $24.82 and $44.70, with a yearly change of 80.10%. Brand recognition also plays a role, as familiarity with a company can influence investment decisions.