SAS vs Teradata Which Offers More Value?
SAS and Teradata are two leading companies in the data analytics and technology industry. Both have strong reputations for providing innovative solutions that help businesses make sense of their data and drive better decision-making. In recent years, the stock performance of these companies has been closely watched by investors, with fluctuations in the market impacting their financial performances. In this comparison, we will analyze the stock performances of SAS and Teradata, shedding light on their strengths, weaknesses, and potential growth prospects.
SAS or Teradata?
When comparing SAS and Teradata, different investors may prioritize various metrics based on their investment strategies and goals. So, ask yourself what type of investor you are. This will guide you in determining which metrics are most important for your investment decision between SAS and Teradata.
Dividend Investors:
Dividend investors look for stable and growing income streams, using dividend metrics to assess potential investments. A company's dividend yield essentially measures the size of its dividend relative to the total market value of the company.
SAS has a dividend yield of -%, while Teradata has a dividend yield of -%. Beyond the yield itself, considering the growth and sustainability of these dividends is also crucial. SAS reports a 5-year dividend growth of 0.00% year and a payout ratio of 0.00%. On the other hand, Teradata reports a 5-year dividend growth of 0.00% year and a payout ratio of 0.00%.
Value Investors:
Value investors focus on financial metrics to determine a stock's intrinsic value compared to its market value. The Price-to-Earnings (P/E) Ratio links stock price to a company's earnings per share, with SAS P/E ratio at -0.00 and Teradata's P/E ratio at 37.85. Another crucial valuation metric is the Price-to-Book (P/B) Ratio, which compares stock price with book value per share. SAS P/B ratio is -0.00 while Teradata's P/B ratio is 24.83.
Growth Investors:
Growth investors prioritize metrics indicative of a company's expansion potential. Focusing on top-line growth, SAS has seen a 5-year revenue growth of -0.79%, while Teradata's is 0.01%. Return on Equity (ROE) measures how effectively a company uses equity investment to generate earnings, with SAS's ROE at 61.55% and Teradata's ROE at 84.54%.
Retail Investors:
Retail investors often consider stock affordability and company familiarity. For example, day low prices are kr0.00 for SAS and $32.08 for Teradata. Over the past year, SAS's prices ranged from kr0.00 to kr0.47, with a yearly change of 17838.46%. Teradata's prices fluctuated between $24.02 and $49.44, with a yearly change of 105.83%. Brand recognition also plays a role, as familiarity with a company can influence investment decisions.