Quaker Chemical vs XP Power Which Is a Better Investment?

Quaker Chemical Corporation and XP Power Limited are two reputable companies in the stock market that offer potential investment opportunities. Quaker Chemical, a global provider of process fluids and specialty chemicals, has a strong track record of delivering consistent financial performance. On the other hand, XP Power, a leading manufacturer of power converters and electronics components, has shown impressive growth and profitability in recent years. Both companies operate in different sectors, providing investors with a diverse range of options for their investment portfolios.

Quaker Chemical

XP Power

Stock Price
Day Low$149.74
Day High$153.84
Year Low$149.74
Year High$221.94
Yearly Change48.22%
Revenue
Revenue Per Share$104.42
5 Year Revenue Growth0.67%
10 Year Revenue Growth0.95%
Profit
Gross Profit Margin0.35%
Operating Profit Margin0.12%
Net Profit Margin0.07%
Stock Price
Day Low$15.25
Day High$15.25
Year Low$11.75
Year High$19.24
Yearly Change63.74%
Revenue
Revenue Per Share$15.14
5 Year Revenue Growth0.56%
10 Year Revenue Growth1.93%
Profit
Gross Profit Margin0.41%
Operating Profit Margin0.07%
Net Profit Margin-0.06%

Quaker Chemical

XP Power

Financial Ratios
P/E ratio22.21
PEG ratio2.40
P/B ratio1.88
ROE8.74%
Payout ratio26.67%
Current ratio2.54
Quick ratio1.88
Cash ratio0.57
Dividend
Dividend Yield1.21%
5 Year Dividend Yield3.95%
10 Year Dividend Yield5.92%
Quaker Chemical Dividend History
Financial Ratios
P/E ratio-12.47
PEG ratio-0.16
P/B ratio1.84
ROE-14.86%
Payout ratio-23.38%
Current ratio1.87
Quick ratio0.99
Cash ratio0.14
Dividend
Dividend Yield-%
5 Year Dividend Yield1.55%
10 Year Dividend Yield0.00%
XP Power Dividend History

Quaker Chemical or XP Power?

When comparing Quaker Chemical and XP Power, different investors may prioritize various metrics based on their investment strategies and goals. So, ask yourself what type of investor you are. This will guide you in determining which metrics are most important for your investment decision between Quaker Chemical and XP Power.

Dividend Investors:

Dividend investors look for stable and growing income streams, using dividend metrics to assess potential investments. A company's dividend yield essentially measures the size of its dividend relative to the total market value of the company. Quaker Chemical has a dividend yield of 1.21%, while XP Power has a dividend yield of -%. Beyond the yield itself, considering the growth and sustainability of these dividends is also crucial. Quaker Chemical reports a 5-year dividend growth of 3.95% year and a payout ratio of 26.67%. On the other hand, XP Power reports a 5-year dividend growth of 1.55% year and a payout ratio of -23.38%.

Value Investors:

Value investors focus on financial metrics to determine a stock's intrinsic value compared to its market value. The Price-to-Earnings (P/E) Ratio links stock price to a company's earnings per share, with Quaker Chemical P/E ratio at 22.21 and XP Power's P/E ratio at -12.47. Another crucial valuation metric is the Price-to-Book (P/B) Ratio, which compares stock price with book value per share. Quaker Chemical P/B ratio is 1.88 while XP Power's P/B ratio is 1.84.

Growth Investors:

Growth investors prioritize metrics indicative of a company's expansion potential. Focusing on top-line growth, Quaker Chemical has seen a 5-year revenue growth of 0.67%, while XP Power's is 0.56%. Return on Equity (ROE) measures how effectively a company uses equity investment to generate earnings, with Quaker Chemical's ROE at 8.74% and XP Power's ROE at -14.86%.

Retail Investors:

Retail investors often consider stock affordability and company familiarity. For example, day low prices are $149.74 for Quaker Chemical and $15.25 for XP Power. Over the past year, Quaker Chemical's prices ranged from $149.74 to $221.94, with a yearly change of 48.22%. XP Power's prices fluctuated between $11.75 and $19.24, with a yearly change of 63.74%. Brand recognition also plays a role, as familiarity with a company can influence investment decisions.

Comparision