Productive Technologies vs Acuity Brands Which Is More Attractive?
Productive Technologies and Acuity Brands are two companies operating in the technology and lighting industries, respectively. Both companies have seen success in their respective markets, with Productive Technologies offering innovative solutions for businesses to improve productivity and efficiency, while Acuity Brands specializes in providing high-quality lighting products for commercial and residential buildings. Investors looking to capitalize on the growth potential in these industries may find opportunities in both companies' stocks, each offering unique potential for long-term growth and profitability.
Productive Technologies or Acuity Brands?
When comparing Productive Technologies and Acuity Brands, different investors may prioritize various metrics based on their investment strategies and goals. So, ask yourself what type of investor you are. This will guide you in determining which metrics are most important for your investment decision between Productive Technologies and Acuity Brands.
Dividend Investors:
Dividend investors look for stable and growing income streams, using dividend metrics to assess potential investments. A company's dividend yield essentially measures the size of its dividend relative to the total market value of the company.
Productive Technologies has a dividend yield of -%, while Acuity Brands has a dividend yield of 0.19%. Beyond the yield itself, considering the growth and sustainability of these dividends is also crucial. Productive Technologies reports a 5-year dividend growth of 0.00% year and a payout ratio of 0.00%. On the other hand, Acuity Brands reports a 5-year dividend growth of 0.00% year and a payout ratio of 4.31%.
Value Investors:
Value investors focus on financial metrics to determine a stock's intrinsic value compared to its market value. The Price-to-Earnings (P/E) Ratio links stock price to a company's earnings per share, with Productive Technologies P/E ratio at -3.22 and Acuity Brands's P/E ratio at 23.53. Another crucial valuation metric is the Price-to-Book (P/B) Ratio, which compares stock price with book value per share. Productive Technologies P/B ratio is 0.63 while Acuity Brands's P/B ratio is 4.18.
Growth Investors:
Growth investors prioritize metrics indicative of a company's expansion potential. Focusing on top-line growth, Productive Technologies has seen a 5-year revenue growth of 2.28%, while Acuity Brands's is 0.38%. Return on Equity (ROE) measures how effectively a company uses equity investment to generate earnings, with Productive Technologies's ROE at -18.60% and Acuity Brands's ROE at 19.11%.
Retail Investors:
Retail investors often consider stock affordability and company familiarity. For example, day low prices are HK$0.15 for Productive Technologies and $321.52 for Acuity Brands. Over the past year, Productive Technologies's prices ranged from HK$0.14 to HK$0.48, with a yearly change of 259.26%. Acuity Brands's prices fluctuated between $196.38 and $337.99, with a yearly change of 72.11%. Brand recognition also plays a role, as familiarity with a company can influence investment decisions.