Nomura vs Macquarie Which Performs Better?

Nomura and Macquarie are two leading financial institutions that are highly regarded in the stock market. Both companies have a strong presence in the global market and offer a range of financial services including stock trading. Investors often compare Nomura and Macquarie stocks due to their reputation for stability and growth potential. Nomura is known for its presence in the Asian market, while Macquarie has a strong reputation in Australia and the UK. Understanding the differences between these two companies can help investors make informed decisions when it comes to their stock portfolios.

Nomura or Macquarie?

When comparing Nomura and Macquarie, different investors may prioritize various metrics based on their investment strategies and goals. So, ask yourself what type of investor you are. This will guide you in determining which metrics are most important for your investment decision between Nomura and Macquarie.

Dividend Investors:

Dividend investors look for stable and growing income streams, using dividend metrics to assess potential investments. A company's dividend yield essentially measures the size of its dividend relative to the total market value of the company. Nomura has a dividend yield of 1.31%, while Macquarie has a dividend yield of 2.94%. Beyond the yield itself, considering the growth and sustainability of these dividends is also crucial. Nomura reports a 5-year dividend growth of 0.00% year and a payout ratio of 8.78%. On the other hand, Macquarie reports a 5-year dividend growth of 24.83% year and a payout ratio of 76.63%.

Value Investors:

Value investors focus on financial metrics to determine a stock's intrinsic value compared to its market value. The Price-to-Earnings (P/E) Ratio links stock price to a company's earnings per share, with Nomura P/E ratio at 10.01 and Macquarie's P/E ratio at 25.10. Another crucial valuation metric is the Price-to-Book (P/B) Ratio, which compares stock price with book value per share. Nomura P/B ratio is 0.83 while Macquarie's P/B ratio is 2.60.

Growth Investors:

Growth investors prioritize metrics indicative of a company's expansion potential. Focusing on top-line growth, Nomura has seen a 5-year revenue growth of 0.03%, while Macquarie's is 0.50%. Return on Equity (ROE) measures how effectively a company uses equity investment to generate earnings, with Nomura's ROE at 8.20% and Macquarie's ROE at 10.51%.

Retail Investors:

Retail investors often consider stock affordability and company familiarity. For example, day low prices are $6.08 for Nomura and $138.20 for Macquarie. Over the past year, Nomura's prices ranged from $4.23 to $6.62, with a yearly change of 56.50%. Macquarie's prices fluctuated between $113.83 and $165.98, with a yearly change of 45.81%. Brand recognition also plays a role, as familiarity with a company can influence investment decisions.