Mitsubishi vs Frontier

Mitsubishi Corporation and Frontier Corporation are two leading companies in the financial sector, each with their own unique strengths and weaknesses. Mitsubishi, a global conglomerate with diversified operations, has a strong track record of delivering consistent returns to investors. On the other hand, Frontier, a smaller firm focused on niche markets, offers higher growth potential but with greater risk. Both stocks have their own set of pros and cons, making them attractive options for investors seeking to diversify their portfolios.

Mitsubishi or Frontier?

When comparing Mitsubishi and Frontier, different investors may prioritize various metrics based on their investment strategies and goals. So, ask yourself what type of investor you are. This will guide you in determining which metrics are most important for your investment decision between Mitsubishi and Frontier.

Dividend Investors:

Dividend investors look for stable and growing income streams, using dividend metrics to assess potential investments. A company's dividend yield essentially measures the size of its dividend relative to the total market value of the company. Mitsubishi has a dividend yield of 2.95%, while Frontier has a dividend yield of -%. Beyond the yield itself, considering the growth and sustainability of these dividends is also crucial. Mitsubishi reports a 5-year dividend growth of 7.47% year and a payout ratio of 28.95%. On the other hand, Frontier reports a 5-year dividend growth of 0.00% year and a payout ratio of 0.00%.

Value Investors:

Value investors focus on financial metrics to determine a stock's intrinsic value compared to its market value. The Price-to-Earnings (P/E) Ratio links stock price to a company's earnings per share, with Mitsubishi P/E ratio at 11.85 and Frontier's P/E ratio at -21.02. Another crucial valuation metric is the Price-to-Book (P/B) Ratio, which compares stock price with book value per share. Mitsubishi P/B ratio is 1.24 while Frontier's P/B ratio is 2.59.

Growth Investors:

Growth investors prioritize metrics indicative of a company's expansion potential. Focusing on top-line growth, Mitsubishi has seen a 5-year revenue growth of 2.10%, while Frontier's is 0.62%. Return on Equity (ROE) measures how effectively a company uses equity investment to generate earnings, with Mitsubishi's ROE at 11.09% and Frontier's ROE at -12.48%.

Retail Investors:

Retail investors often consider stock affordability and company familiarity. For example, day low prices are $19.50 for Mitsubishi and $5.99 for Frontier. Over the past year, Mitsubishi's prices ranged from $14.68 to $24.52, with a yearly change of 67.03%. Frontier's prices fluctuated between $2.79 and $8.33, with a yearly change of 198.57%. Brand recognition also plays a role, as familiarity with a company can influence investment decisions.