MIG vs Aeon Which Is Stronger?

MIG and Aeon stocks are two popular choices for investors looking to diversify their portfolios. MIG, also known as Macquarie Infrastructure Corporation, is a company focused on infrastructure investments with a strong track record of steady growth. Aeon, on the other hand, is a leading Asian retail and financial services conglomerate with a global presence. Both stocks offer unique opportunities for investors seeking to capitalize on different sectors of the economy. Understanding the key differences and similarities between MIG and Aeon stocks can help investors make informed decisions for their portfolios.

MIG or Aeon?

When comparing MIG and Aeon, different investors may prioritize various metrics based on their investment strategies and goals. So, ask yourself what type of investor you are. This will guide you in determining which metrics are most important for your investment decision between MIG and Aeon.

Dividend Investors:

Dividend investors look for stable and growing income streams, using dividend metrics to assess potential investments. A company's dividend yield essentially measures the size of its dividend relative to the total market value of the company. MIG has a dividend yield of -%, while Aeon has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Beyond the yield itself, considering the growth and sustainability of these dividends is also crucial. MIG reports a 5-year dividend growth of 0.00% year and a payout ratio of 0.00%. On the other hand, Aeon reports a 5-year dividend growth of -7.54% year and a payout ratio of 0.00%.

Value Investors:

Value investors focus on financial metrics to determine a stock's intrinsic value compared to its market value. The Price-to-Earnings (P/E) Ratio links stock price to a company's earnings per share, with MIG P/E ratio at 14.40 and Aeon's P/E ratio at 117.52. Another crucial valuation metric is the Price-to-Book (P/B) Ratio, which compares stock price with book value per share. MIG P/B ratio is 0.73 while Aeon's P/B ratio is 3.03.

Growth Investors:

Growth investors prioritize metrics indicative of a company's expansion potential. Focusing on top-line growth, MIG has seen a 5-year revenue growth of -1.00%, while Aeon's is 0.07%. Return on Equity (ROE) measures how effectively a company uses equity investment to generate earnings, with MIG's ROE at 5.18% and Aeon's ROE at 2.58%.

Retail Investors:

Retail investors often consider stock affordability and company familiarity. For example, day low prices are €2.95 for MIG and $24.52 for Aeon. Over the past year, MIG's prices ranged from €2.90 to €5.28, with a yearly change of 82.07%. Aeon's prices fluctuated between $20.27 and $29.30, with a yearly change of 44.55%. Brand recognition also plays a role, as familiarity with a company can influence investment decisions.