Koninklijke Philips vs Panasonic Which Is More Reliable?

Koninklijke Philips and Panasonic are two prominent companies in the electronics sector, with a long history of competing in the consumer electronics market. Both companies have a global presence and are known for their innovative products and technologies. However, their stock performance has shown differences in recent years. While Philips has seen steady growth and strong financial performance, Panasonic has faced challenges and fluctuations in its stock value. This comparison will delve into the factors influencing their stock performance and provide insights for investors.

Koninklijke Philips or Panasonic?

When comparing Koninklijke Philips and Panasonic, different investors may prioritize various metrics based on their investment strategies and goals. So, ask yourself what type of investor you are. This will guide you in determining which metrics are most important for your investment decision between Koninklijke Philips and Panasonic.

Dividend Investors:

Dividend investors look for stable and growing income streams, using dividend metrics to assess potential investments. A company's dividend yield essentially measures the size of its dividend relative to the total market value of the company. Koninklijke Philips has a dividend yield of 3.71%, while Panasonic has a dividend yield of 2.84%. Beyond the yield itself, considering the growth and sustainability of these dividends is also crucial. Koninklijke Philips reports a 5-year dividend growth of 0.00% year and a payout ratio of 0.00%. On the other hand, Panasonic reports a 5-year dividend growth of -6.44% year and a payout ratio of 26.04%.

Value Investors:

Value investors focus on financial metrics to determine a stock's intrinsic value compared to its market value. The Price-to-Earnings (P/E) Ratio links stock price to a company's earnings per share, with Koninklijke Philips P/E ratio at -71.10 and Panasonic's P/E ratio at 10.25. Another crucial valuation metric is the Price-to-Book (P/B) Ratio, which compares stock price with book value per share. Koninklijke Philips P/B ratio is 1.96 while Panasonic's P/B ratio is 0.66.

Growth Investors:

Growth investors prioritize metrics indicative of a company's expansion potential. Focusing on top-line growth, Koninklijke Philips has seen a 5-year revenue growth of 0.03%, while Panasonic's is 0.05%. Return on Equity (ROE) measures how effectively a company uses equity investment to generate earnings, with Koninklijke Philips's ROE at -2.74% and Panasonic's ROE at 7.01%.

Retail Investors:

Retail investors often consider stock affordability and company familiarity. For example, day low prices are $26.36 for Koninklijke Philips and $8.95 for Panasonic. Over the past year, Koninklijke Philips's prices ranged from $19.49 to $32.91, with a yearly change of 68.86%. Panasonic's prices fluctuated between $6.85 and $10.82, with a yearly change of 57.96%. Brand recognition also plays a role, as familiarity with a company can influence investment decisions.