KING vs Frontier Which Is Superior?
KING vs Frontier stocks represent two distinct investment options with different risk profiles and potential for returns. KING stocks typically refer to established, large-cap companies with stable earnings and market dominance. On the other hand, Frontier stocks are characterized by companies operating in emerging markets or industries with high growth potential but also higher risk. Investors must carefully weigh the pros and cons of both types of stocks to build a well-balanced and diversified portfolio.
KING or Frontier?
When comparing KING and Frontier, different investors may prioritize various metrics based on their investment strategies and goals. So, ask yourself what type of investor you are. This will guide you in determining which metrics are most important for your investment decision between KING and Frontier.
Dividend Investors:
Dividend investors look for stable and growing income streams, using dividend metrics to assess potential investments. A company's dividend yield essentially measures the size of its dividend relative to the total market value of the company.
KING has a dividend yield of 2.37%, while Frontier has a dividend yield of -%. Beyond the yield itself, considering the growth and sustainability of these dividends is also crucial. KING reports a 5-year dividend growth of 0.00% year and a payout ratio of 0.00%. On the other hand, Frontier reports a 5-year dividend growth of 0.00% year and a payout ratio of 0.00%.
Value Investors:
Value investors focus on financial metrics to determine a stock's intrinsic value compared to its market value. The Price-to-Earnings (P/E) Ratio links stock price to a company's earnings per share, with KING P/E ratio at 21.55 and Frontier's P/E ratio at -257.78. Another crucial valuation metric is the Price-to-Book (P/B) Ratio, which compares stock price with book value per share. KING P/B ratio is 0.56 while Frontier's P/B ratio is 2.82.
Growth Investors:
Growth investors prioritize metrics indicative of a company's expansion potential. Focusing on top-line growth, KING has seen a 5-year revenue growth of -0.13%, while Frontier's is 0.62%. Return on Equity (ROE) measures how effectively a company uses equity investment to generate earnings, with KING's ROE at 2.57% and Frontier's ROE at -1.17%.
Retail Investors:
Retail investors often consider stock affordability and company familiarity. For example, day low prices are ¥759.00 for KING and $6.17 for Frontier. Over the past year, KING's prices ranged from ¥589.00 to ¥778.00, with a yearly change of 32.09%. Frontier's prices fluctuated between $2.79 and $8.33, with a yearly change of 198.57%. Brand recognition also plays a role, as familiarity with a company can influence investment decisions.