iRobot vs SharkNinja Which Is Stronger?

iRobot and SharkNinja are two prominent companies in the home appliance and robotics industry. iRobot, known for its Roomba robotic vacuum cleaners, has seen steady growth in recent years, driven by increased demand for smart home technology. On the flip side, SharkNinja, famous for its line of innovative blenders and vacuum cleaners, has also experienced considerable success in the market. In this competitive landscape, investors are closely monitoring the performance of both stocks to determine which company presents a better investment opportunity.

iRobot or SharkNinja?

When comparing iRobot and SharkNinja, different investors may prioritize various metrics based on their investment strategies and goals. So, ask yourself what type of investor you are. This will guide you in determining which metrics are most important for your investment decision between iRobot and SharkNinja.

Dividend Investors:

Dividend investors look for stable and growing income streams, using dividend metrics to assess potential investments. A company's dividend yield essentially measures the size of its dividend relative to the total market value of the company. iRobot has a dividend yield of -%, while SharkNinja has a dividend yield of 1.04%. Beyond the yield itself, considering the growth and sustainability of these dividends is also crucial. iRobot reports a 5-year dividend growth of 0.00% year and a payout ratio of 0.00%. On the other hand, SharkNinja reports a 5-year dividend growth of 0.00% year and a payout ratio of 41.80%.

Value Investors:

Value investors focus on financial metrics to determine a stock's intrinsic value compared to its market value. The Price-to-Earnings (P/E) Ratio links stock price to a company's earnings per share, with iRobot P/E ratio at -1.66 and SharkNinja's P/E ratio at 40.66. Another crucial valuation metric is the Price-to-Book (P/B) Ratio, which compares stock price with book value per share. iRobot P/B ratio is 1.46 while SharkNinja's P/B ratio is 8.14.

Growth Investors:

Growth investors prioritize metrics indicative of a company's expansion potential. Focusing on top-line growth, iRobot has seen a 5-year revenue growth of -0.21%, while SharkNinja's is 0.54%. Return on Equity (ROE) measures how effectively a company uses equity investment to generate earnings, with iRobot's ROE at -75.45% and SharkNinja's ROE at 22.14%.

Retail Investors:

Retail investors often consider stock affordability and company familiarity. For example, day low prices are $6.88 for iRobot and $101.47 for SharkNinja. Over the past year, iRobot's prices ranged from $5.83 to $42.14, with a yearly change of 622.81%. SharkNinja's prices fluctuated between $41.12 and $112.93, with a yearly change of 174.64%. Brand recognition also plays a role, as familiarity with a company can influence investment decisions.