IMI vs Epic Which Is More Reliable?

IMI plc, a British engineering company with a strong focus on innovative technologies and sustainable solutions, has been a steady performer in the stock market for many years. On the other hand, Epic Systems, a leading healthcare software company based in the United States, has experienced rapid growth and expansion in recent years due to its cutting-edge electronic medical record systems. Both companies have their own unique strengths and opportunities for investors looking to diversify their portfolios in the industrial and healthcare sectors.

IMI or Epic?

When comparing IMI and Epic, different investors may prioritize various metrics based on their investment strategies and goals. So, ask yourself what type of investor you are. This will guide you in determining which metrics are most important for your investment decision between IMI and Epic.

Dividend Investors:

Dividend investors look for stable and growing income streams, using dividend metrics to assess potential investments. A company's dividend yield essentially measures the size of its dividend relative to the total market value of the company. IMI has a dividend yield of 1.57%, while Epic has a dividend yield of -%. Beyond the yield itself, considering the growth and sustainability of these dividends is also crucial. IMI reports a 5-year dividend growth of -7.81% year and a payout ratio of 29.10%. On the other hand, Epic reports a 5-year dividend growth of 0.00% year and a payout ratio of 0.00%.

Value Investors:

Value investors focus on financial metrics to determine a stock's intrinsic value compared to its market value. The Price-to-Earnings (P/E) Ratio links stock price to a company's earnings per share, with IMI P/E ratio at 19.16 and Epic's P/E ratio at 0.00. Another crucial valuation metric is the Price-to-Book (P/B) Ratio, which compares stock price with book value per share. IMI P/B ratio is 4.44 while Epic's P/B ratio is 0.00.

Growth Investors:

Growth investors prioritize metrics indicative of a company's expansion potential. Focusing on top-line growth, IMI has seen a 5-year revenue growth of 0.20%, while Epic's is 0.00%. Return on Equity (ROE) measures how effectively a company uses equity investment to generate earnings, with IMI's ROE at 23.85% and Epic's ROE at 20.56%.

Retail Investors:

Retail investors often consider stock affordability and company familiarity. For example, day low prices are £1848.00 for IMI and $0.00 for Epic. Over the past year, IMI's prices ranged from £1531.00 to £1911.00, with a yearly change of 24.82%. Epic's prices fluctuated between $0.00 and $0.00, with a yearly change of 9900.00%. Brand recognition also plays a role, as familiarity with a company can influence investment decisions.