Frontier vs Fossil Which Is More Lucrative?

Frontier vs Fossil stocks represent two opposing investment strategies in the energy sector. Frontier stocks focus on innovative, renewable energy sources such as solar, wind, and hydro power, while fossil stocks rely on traditional oil, gas, and coal extraction. Investors must weigh the potential long-term benefits of sustainability and environmental responsibility against the short-term profits of established fossil fuel companies. The debate continues as the global push for clean energy solutions intensifies.

Frontier or Fossil?

When comparing Frontier and Fossil, different investors may prioritize various metrics based on their investment strategies and goals. So, ask yourself what type of investor you are. This will guide you in determining which metrics are most important for your investment decision between Frontier and Fossil.

Dividend Investors:

Dividend investors look for stable and growing income streams, using dividend metrics to assess potential investments. A company's dividend yield essentially measures the size of its dividend relative to the total market value of the company. Frontier has a dividend yield of -%, while Fossil has a dividend yield of -%. Beyond the yield itself, considering the growth and sustainability of these dividends is also crucial. Frontier reports a 5-year dividend growth of 0.00% year and a payout ratio of 0.00%. On the other hand, Fossil reports a 5-year dividend growth of 0.00% year and a payout ratio of 0.00%.

Value Investors:

Value investors focus on financial metrics to determine a stock's intrinsic value compared to its market value. The Price-to-Earnings (P/E) Ratio links stock price to a company's earnings per share, with Frontier P/E ratio at -251.12 and Fossil's P/E ratio at -0.54. Another crucial valuation metric is the Price-to-Book (P/B) Ratio, which compares stock price with book value per share. Frontier P/B ratio is 2.74 while Fossil's P/B ratio is 0.00.

Growth Investors:

Growth investors prioritize metrics indicative of a company's expansion potential. Focusing on top-line growth, Frontier has seen a 5-year revenue growth of 0.62%, while Fossil's is -0.48%. Return on Equity (ROE) measures how effectively a company uses equity investment to generate earnings, with Frontier's ROE at -1.17% and Fossil's ROE at -73.28%.

Retail Investors:

Retail investors often consider stock affordability and company familiarity. For example, day low prices are $6.57 for Frontier and $1.17 for Fossil. Over the past year, Frontier's prices ranged from $2.79 to $8.33, with a yearly change of 198.57%. Fossil's prices fluctuated between $0.75 and $1.74, with a yearly change of 132.00%. Brand recognition also plays a role, as familiarity with a company can influence investment decisions.