Fields vs Mayfield

Fields vs. Mayfield stocks have been a topic of debate among investors for quite some time. Fields stocks are known for their stability and consistent growth, appealing to those looking for a long-term investment with lower risk. On the other hand, Mayfield stocks are more volatile and have the potential for higher returns, attracting risk-tolerant investors seeking quick gains. Both options have their advantages and disadvantages, making it essential for investors to carefully consider their goals and risk tolerance before making a decision.

Fields or Mayfield?

When comparing Fields and Mayfield, different investors may prioritize various metrics based on their investment strategies and goals. So, ask yourself what type of investor you are. This will guide you in determining which metrics are most important for your investment decision between Fields and Mayfield.

Dividend Investors:

Dividend investors look for stable and growing income streams, using dividend metrics to assess potential investments. A company's dividend yield essentially measures the size of its dividend relative to the total market value of the company. Fields has a dividend yield of 1.65%, while Mayfield has a dividend yield of 4.41%. Beyond the yield itself, considering the growth and sustainability of these dividends is also crucial. Fields reports a 5-year dividend growth of 0.00% year and a payout ratio of 21.84%. On the other hand, Mayfield reports a 5-year dividend growth of 0.00% year and a payout ratio of 26.58%.

Value Investors:

Value investors focus on financial metrics to determine a stock's intrinsic value compared to its market value. The Price-to-Earnings (P/E) Ratio links stock price to a company's earnings per share, with Fields P/E ratio at 12.64 and Mayfield's P/E ratio at 5.69. Another crucial valuation metric is the Price-to-Book (P/B) Ratio, which compares stock price with book value per share. Fields P/B ratio is 3.75 while Mayfield's P/B ratio is 1.82.

Growth Investors:

Growth investors prioritize metrics indicative of a company's expansion potential. Focusing on top-line growth, Fields has seen a 5-year revenue growth of 1.79%, while Mayfield's is 0.20%. Return on Equity (ROE) measures how effectively a company uses equity investment to generate earnings, with Fields's ROE at 27.18% and Mayfield's ROE at 36.79%.

Retail Investors:

Retail investors often consider stock affordability and company familiarity. For example, day low prices are ¥2369.00 for Fields and A$0.68 for Mayfield. Over the past year, Fields's prices ranged from ¥1070.00 to ¥2579.00, with a yearly change of 141.03%. Mayfield's prices fluctuated between A$0.41 and A$0.99, with a yearly change of 145.68%. Brand recognition also plays a role, as familiarity with a company can influence investment decisions.