Fields vs Brady Which Is More Lucrative?

Fields vs Brady stocks is a hotly debated topic among investors and financial experts. Justin Fields, the young and promising rookie quarterback for the Chicago Bears, represents growth potential and market excitement. On the other hand, Tom Brady, the seasoned veteran and multiple-time Super Bowl champion with the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, is often seen as a more stable and reliable investment. Both players have their strengths and weaknesses, making it a difficult decision for investors to choose between them in the stock market.

Fields or Brady?

When comparing Fields and Brady, different investors may prioritize various metrics based on their investment strategies and goals. So, ask yourself what type of investor you are. This will guide you in determining which metrics are most important for your investment decision between Fields and Brady.

Dividend Investors:

Dividend investors look for stable and growing income streams, using dividend metrics to assess potential investments. A company's dividend yield essentially measures the size of its dividend relative to the total market value of the company. Fields has a dividend yield of 2.08%, while Brady has a dividend yield of 1.54%. Beyond the yield itself, considering the growth and sustainability of these dividends is also crucial. Fields reports a 5-year dividend growth of 0.00% year and a payout ratio of 21.84%. On the other hand, Brady reports a 5-year dividend growth of 2.07% year and a payout ratio of 22.85%.

Value Investors:

Value investors focus on financial metrics to determine a stock's intrinsic value compared to its market value. The Price-to-Earnings (P/E) Ratio links stock price to a company's earnings per share, with Fields P/E ratio at 10.18 and Brady's P/E ratio at 18.57. Another crucial valuation metric is the Price-to-Book (P/B) Ratio, which compares stock price with book value per share. Fields P/B ratio is 2.96 while Brady's P/B ratio is 3.43.

Growth Investors:

Growth investors prioritize metrics indicative of a company's expansion potential. Focusing on top-line growth, Fields has seen a 5-year revenue growth of 1.79%, while Brady's is 0.18%. Return on Equity (ROE) measures how effectively a company uses equity investment to generate earnings, with Fields's ROE at 27.18% and Brady's ROE at 19.14%.

Retail Investors:

Retail investors often consider stock affordability and company familiarity. For example, day low prices are ¥1914.00 for Fields and $76.81 for Brady. Over the past year, Fields's prices ranged from ¥1070.00 to ¥2579.00, with a yearly change of 141.03%. Brady's prices fluctuated between $52.68 and $77.68, with a yearly change of 47.46%. Brand recognition also plays a role, as familiarity with a company can influence investment decisions.