Era vs Aion Therapeutic Which Offers More Value?

Both Era and Aion Therapeutic are companies within the burgeoning field of psychedelic medicine, each with unique approaches to utilizing these substances for therapeutic purposes. Era focuses on developing advanced therapies and drug delivery systems, while Aion Therapeutic is rooted in research and development of novel psychedelics. Both stocks have attracted investor attention due to the increasing mainstream acceptance of psychedelic therapies and the potential for significant growth in this emerging market. This comparison will analyze the strengths and weaknesses of each company's stock performance and future prospects in the psychedelic medicine sector.

Era

Aion Therapeutic

Stock Price
Day Low¥4.41
Day High¥4.59
Year Low¥3.63
Year High¥7.87
Yearly Change116.80%
Revenue
Revenue Per Share¥5.51
5 Year Revenue Growth0.26%
10 Year Revenue Growth1.35%
Profit
Gross Profit Margin0.20%
Operating Profit Margin0.04%
Net Profit Margin0.03%
Stock Price
Day LowC$0.02
Day HighC$0.02
Year LowC$0.01
Year HighC$0.02
Yearly Change300.00%
Revenue
Revenue Per ShareC$0.00
5 Year Revenue Growth0.00%
10 Year Revenue Growth0.00%
Profit
Gross Profit Margin-0.45%
Operating Profit Margin-3.22%
Net Profit Margin-17.11%

Era

Aion Therapeutic

Financial Ratios
P/E ratio23.26
PEG ratio-0.99
P/B ratio1.00
ROE4.31%
Payout ratio54.54%
Current ratio1.49
Quick ratio1.01
Cash ratio0.38
Dividend
Dividend Yield2.25%
5 Year Dividend Yield-14.33%
10 Year Dividend Yield-23.72%
Era Dividend History
Financial Ratios
P/E ratio-1.31
PEG ratio0.00
P/B ratio-2.13
ROE304.86%
Payout ratio0.00%
Current ratio0.12
Quick ratio0.03
Cash ratio0.01
Dividend
Dividend Yield-%
5 Year Dividend Yield0.00%
10 Year Dividend Yield0.00%
Aion Therapeutic Dividend History

Era or Aion Therapeutic?

When comparing Era and Aion Therapeutic, different investors may prioritize various metrics based on their investment strategies and goals. So, ask yourself what type of investor you are. This will guide you in determining which metrics are most important for your investment decision between Era and Aion Therapeutic.

Dividend Investors:

Dividend investors look for stable and growing income streams, using dividend metrics to assess potential investments. A company's dividend yield essentially measures the size of its dividend relative to the total market value of the company. Era has a dividend yield of 2.25%, while Aion Therapeutic has a dividend yield of -%. Beyond the yield itself, considering the growth and sustainability of these dividends is also crucial. Era reports a 5-year dividend growth of -14.33% year and a payout ratio of 54.54%. On the other hand, Aion Therapeutic reports a 5-year dividend growth of 0.00% year and a payout ratio of 0.00%.

Value Investors:

Value investors focus on financial metrics to determine a stock's intrinsic value compared to its market value. The Price-to-Earnings (P/E) Ratio links stock price to a company's earnings per share, with Era P/E ratio at 23.26 and Aion Therapeutic's P/E ratio at -1.31. Another crucial valuation metric is the Price-to-Book (P/B) Ratio, which compares stock price with book value per share. Era P/B ratio is 1.00 while Aion Therapeutic's P/B ratio is -2.13.

Growth Investors:

Growth investors prioritize metrics indicative of a company's expansion potential. Focusing on top-line growth, Era has seen a 5-year revenue growth of 0.26%, while Aion Therapeutic's is 0.00%. Return on Equity (ROE) measures how effectively a company uses equity investment to generate earnings, with Era's ROE at 4.31% and Aion Therapeutic's ROE at 304.86%.

Retail Investors:

Retail investors often consider stock affordability and company familiarity. For example, day low prices are ¥4.41 for Era and C$0.02 for Aion Therapeutic. Over the past year, Era's prices ranged from ¥3.63 to ¥7.87, with a yearly change of 116.80%. Aion Therapeutic's prices fluctuated between C$0.01 and C$0.02, with a yearly change of 300.00%. Brand recognition also plays a role, as familiarity with a company can influence investment decisions.

Comparision