Compass vs UT Which Performs Better?

Compass and UT stocks are two compelling options for investors looking to diversify their portfolios. Compass offers a unique real estate investment platform that allows individuals to invest in high-quality real estate properties without the burdens of property management. On the other hand, UT stocks provide an opportunity to invest in a variety of traditional stocks and bonds through a unified trust structure. Both options offer potential for growth and stability, making them worthy considerations for any investor.

Compass or UT?

When comparing Compass and UT, different investors may prioritize various metrics based on their investment strategies and goals. So, ask yourself what type of investor you are. This will guide you in determining which metrics are most important for your investment decision between Compass and UT.

Dividend Investors:

Dividend investors look for stable and growing income streams, using dividend metrics to assess potential investments. A company's dividend yield essentially measures the size of its dividend relative to the total market value of the company. Compass has a dividend yield of -%, while UT has a dividend yield of 4.52%. Beyond the yield itself, considering the growth and sustainability of these dividends is also crucial. Compass reports a 5-year dividend growth of 0.00% year and a payout ratio of -14.93%. On the other hand, UT reports a 5-year dividend growth of 0.00% year and a payout ratio of 0.00%.

Value Investors:

Value investors focus on financial metrics to determine a stock's intrinsic value compared to its market value. The Price-to-Earnings (P/E) Ratio links stock price to a company's earnings per share, with Compass P/E ratio at -17.34 and UT's P/E ratio at 9.08. Another crucial valuation metric is the Price-to-Book (P/B) Ratio, which compares stock price with book value per share. Compass P/B ratio is 8.00 while UT's P/B ratio is 2.45.

Growth Investors:

Growth investors prioritize metrics indicative of a company's expansion potential. Focusing on top-line growth, Compass has seen a 5-year revenue growth of 3.20%, while UT's is 0.59%. Return on Equity (ROE) measures how effectively a company uses equity investment to generate earnings, with Compass's ROE at -49.85% and UT's ROE at 28.80%.

Retail Investors:

Retail investors often consider stock affordability and company familiarity. For example, day low prices are $6.72 for Compass and ¥2123.00 for UT. Over the past year, Compass's prices ranged from $2.78 to $7.69, with a yearly change of 176.62%. UT's prices fluctuated between ¥1942.00 and ¥3770.00, with a yearly change of 94.13%. Brand recognition also plays a role, as familiarity with a company can influence investment decisions.