Cisco Systems vs Lam Research

Cisco Systems and Lam Research are two leading companies in the technology sector, both offering innovative solutions and products in their respective fields. While Cisco Systems specializes in networking equipment and services, Lam Research focuses on semiconductor manufacturing equipment. Both companies have shown strong performance in the stock market, but their strategies and growth potential vary. Investors looking for stable dividends and a strong market position may lean towards Cisco Systems, while those seeking growth opportunities in the semiconductor industry may favor Lam Research.

Cisco Systems

Lam Research

Stock Price
Day Low$53.92
Day High$54.61
Year Low$44.50
Year High$54.61
Yearly Change22.71%
Revenue
Revenue Per Share$13.39
5 Year Revenue Growth0.37%
10 Year Revenue Growth0.53%
Profit
Gross Profit Margin0.65%
Operating Profit Margin0.24%
Net Profit Margin0.19%
Stock Price
Day Low$75.91
Day High$86.56
Year Low$57.44
Year High$113.00
Yearly Change96.72%
Revenue
Revenue Per Share$11.41
5 Year Revenue Growth1.10%
10 Year Revenue Growth5.04%
Profit
Gross Profit Margin0.47%
Operating Profit Margin0.29%
Net Profit Margin0.26%

Cisco Systems

Lam Research

Financial Ratios
P/E ratio21.06
PEG ratio-1.46
P/B ratio4.78
ROE22.60%
Payout ratio61.86%
Current ratio0.91
Quick ratio0.83
Cash ratio0.18
Dividend
Dividend Yield2.94%
5 Year Dividend Yield3.90%
10 Year Dividend Yield11.76%
Cisco Systems Dividend History
Financial Ratios
P/E ratio26.06
PEG ratio-1.65
P/B ratio11.68
ROE46.64%
Payout ratio26.62%
Current ratio2.97
Quick ratio2.00
Cash ratio1.35
Dividend
Dividend Yield10.87%
5 Year Dividend Yield14.41%
10 Year Dividend Yield0.00%
Lam Research Dividend History

Cisco Systems or Lam Research?

When comparing Cisco Systems and Lam Research, different investors may prioritize various metrics based on their investment strategies and goals. So, ask yourself what type of investor you are. This will guide you in determining which metrics are most important for your investment decision between Cisco Systems and Lam Research.

Dividend Investors:

Dividend investors look for stable and growing income streams, using dividend metrics to assess potential investments. A company's dividend yield essentially measures the size of its dividend relative to the total market value of the company. Cisco Systems has a dividend yield of 2.94%, while Lam Research has a dividend yield of 10.87%. Beyond the yield itself, considering the growth and sustainability of these dividends is also crucial. Cisco Systems reports a 5-year dividend growth of 3.90% year and a payout ratio of 61.86%. On the other hand, Lam Research reports a 5-year dividend growth of 14.41% year and a payout ratio of 26.62%.

Value Investors:

Value investors focus on financial metrics to determine a stock's intrinsic value compared to its market value. The Price-to-Earnings (P/E) Ratio links stock price to a company's earnings per share, with Cisco Systems P/E ratio at 21.06 and Lam Research's P/E ratio at 26.06. Another crucial valuation metric is the Price-to-Book (P/B) Ratio, which compares stock price with book value per share. Cisco Systems P/B ratio is 4.78 while Lam Research's P/B ratio is 11.68.

Growth Investors:

Growth investors prioritize metrics indicative of a company's expansion potential. Focusing on top-line growth, Cisco Systems has seen a 5-year revenue growth of 0.37%, while Lam Research's is 1.10%. Return on Equity (ROE) measures how effectively a company uses equity investment to generate earnings, with Cisco Systems's ROE at 22.60% and Lam Research's ROE at 46.64%.

Retail Investors:

Retail investors often consider stock affordability and company familiarity. For example, day low prices are $53.92 for Cisco Systems and $75.91 for Lam Research. Over the past year, Cisco Systems's prices ranged from $44.50 to $54.61, with a yearly change of 22.71%. Lam Research's prices fluctuated between $57.44 and $113.00, with a yearly change of 96.72%. Brand recognition also plays a role, as familiarity with a company can influence investment decisions.

Comparision