ATP 30 vs Blink Charging Which Is a Better Investment?

ATP 30 and Blink Charging are two companies in the energy sector that are worth comparing. ATP 30 focuses on developing innovative energy solutions for various industries, while Blink Charging specializes in providing electric vehicle charging stations. Both stocks have shown significant growth potential in recent years, with ATP 30 benefiting from increased demand for sustainable energy solutions, and Blink Charging capitalizing on the shift towards electric vehicles. Investors looking to diversify their portfolio with energy stocks may find both ATP 30 and Blink Charging attractive options.

ATP 30 or Blink Charging?

When comparing ATP 30 and Blink Charging, different investors may prioritize various metrics based on their investment strategies and goals. So, ask yourself what type of investor you are. This will guide you in determining which metrics are most important for your investment decision between ATP 30 and Blink Charging.

Dividend Investors:

Dividend investors look for stable and growing income streams, using dividend metrics to assess potential investments. A company's dividend yield essentially measures the size of its dividend relative to the total market value of the company. ATP 30 has a dividend yield of 2.0%, while Blink Charging has a dividend yield of -%. Beyond the yield itself, considering the growth and sustainability of these dividends is also crucial. ATP 30 reports a 5-year dividend growth of 0.00% year and a payout ratio of 31.59%. On the other hand, Blink Charging reports a 5-year dividend growth of 0.00% year and a payout ratio of -0.57%.

Value Investors:

Value investors focus on financial metrics to determine a stock's intrinsic value compared to its market value. The Price-to-Earnings (P/E) Ratio links stock price to a company's earnings per share, with ATP 30 P/E ratio at 15.47 and Blink Charging's P/E ratio at -1.09. Another crucial valuation metric is the Price-to-Book (P/B) Ratio, which compares stock price with book value per share. ATP 30 P/B ratio is 1.25 while Blink Charging's P/B ratio is 0.81.

Growth Investors:

Growth investors prioritize metrics indicative of a company's expansion potential. Focusing on top-line growth, ATP 30 has seen a 5-year revenue growth of 0.32%, while Blink Charging's is 16.04%. Return on Equity (ROE) measures how effectively a company uses equity investment to generate earnings, with ATP 30's ROE at 8.21% and Blink Charging's ROE at -54.51%.

Retail Investors:

Retail investors often consider stock affordability and company familiarity. For example, day low prices are ฿0.99 for ATP 30 and $1.53 for Blink Charging. Over the past year, ATP 30's prices ranged from ฿0.81 to ฿1.33, with a yearly change of 64.20%. Blink Charging's prices fluctuated between $1.48 and $4.48, with a yearly change of 202.70%. Brand recognition also plays a role, as familiarity with a company can influence investment decisions.