ATN International vs Firefly

ATN International and Firefly are two companies operating in the telecommunications industry, but they differ significantly in their market positioning and growth prospects. ATN International is a well-established player with a diverse portfolio of services, including wireless, broadband, and cable television. On the other hand, Firefly is a newer entrant focusing on innovative technologies and disruptive business models. Investors looking for stability and steady growth may favor ATN International, while those seeking high-risk, high-reward opportunities may be drawn to Firefly.

ATN International

Firefly

Stock Price
Day Low$32.09
Day High$33.07
Year Low$18.20
Year High$39.88
Yearly Change119.12%
Revenue
Revenue Per Share$49.83
5 Year Revenue Growth0.73%
10 Year Revenue Growth1.63%
Profit
Gross Profit Margin0.58%
Operating Profit Margin0.03%
Net Profit Margin-0.01%
Stock Price
Day Lowkr189.50
Day Highkr195.00
Year Lowkr119.00
Year Highkr238.00
Yearly Change100.00%
Revenue
Revenue Per Sharekr83.52
5 Year Revenue Growth1.05%
10 Year Revenue Growth2.94%
Profit
Gross Profit Margin0.41%
Operating Profit Margin0.14%
Net Profit Margin0.10%

ATN International

Firefly

Financial Ratios
P/E ratio-60.24
PEG ratio-74.32
P/B ratio0.94
ROE-1.53%
Payout ratio-170.01%
Current ratio1.10
Quick ratio1.04
Cash ratio0.27
Dividend
Dividend Yield2.96%
5 Year Dividend Yield5.05%
10 Year Dividend Yield-3.86%
ATN International Dividend History
Financial Ratios
P/E ratio22.11
PEG ratio-0.41
P/B ratio8.06
ROE35.42%
Payout ratio54.56%
Current ratio2.25
Quick ratio1.31
Cash ratio-0.33
Dividend
Dividend Yield2.47%
5 Year Dividend Yield20.11%
10 Year Dividend Yield0.00%
Firefly Dividend History

ATN International or Firefly?

When comparing ATN International and Firefly, different investors may prioritize various metrics based on their investment strategies and goals. So, ask yourself what type of investor you are. This will guide you in determining which metrics are most important for your investment decision between ATN International and Firefly.

Dividend Investors:

Dividend investors look for stable and growing income streams, using dividend metrics to assess potential investments. A company's dividend yield essentially measures the size of its dividend relative to the total market value of the company. ATN International has a dividend yield of 2.96%, while Firefly has a dividend yield of 2.47%. Beyond the yield itself, considering the growth and sustainability of these dividends is also crucial. ATN International reports a 5-year dividend growth of 5.05% year and a payout ratio of -170.01%. On the other hand, Firefly reports a 5-year dividend growth of 20.11% year and a payout ratio of 54.56%.

Value Investors:

Value investors focus on financial metrics to determine a stock's intrinsic value compared to its market value. The Price-to-Earnings (P/E) Ratio links stock price to a company's earnings per share, with ATN International P/E ratio at -60.24 and Firefly's P/E ratio at 22.11. Another crucial valuation metric is the Price-to-Book (P/B) Ratio, which compares stock price with book value per share. ATN International P/B ratio is 0.94 while Firefly's P/B ratio is 8.06.

Growth Investors:

Growth investors prioritize metrics indicative of a company's expansion potential. Focusing on top-line growth, ATN International has seen a 5-year revenue growth of 0.73%, while Firefly's is 1.05%. Return on Equity (ROE) measures how effectively a company uses equity investment to generate earnings, with ATN International's ROE at -1.53% and Firefly's ROE at 35.42%.

Retail Investors:

Retail investors often consider stock affordability and company familiarity. For example, day low prices are $32.09 for ATN International and kr189.50 for Firefly. Over the past year, ATN International's prices ranged from $18.20 to $39.88, with a yearly change of 119.12%. Firefly's prices fluctuated between kr119.00 and kr238.00, with a yearly change of 100.00%. Brand recognition also plays a role, as familiarity with a company can influence investment decisions.

Comparision