Asiana Airlines vs ANA Which Is a Better Investment?

Asiana Airlines and ANA (All Nippon Airways) are two prominent players in the aviation industry, both based in Asia with a strong presence in their respective domestic and international markets. Asiana Airlines is a South Korean carrier known for its extensive network connecting various destinations around the world, while ANA is a Japanese airline recognized for its top-notch services and operational efficiency. Both airlines have experienced fluctuations in their stock prices due to factors such as industry competition, economic conditions, and global events. This comparison aims to analyze the performance and outlook of Asiana Airlines vs. ANA stocks.

Asiana Airlines

ANA

Stock Price
Day Low₩9480.00
Day High₩9770.00
Year Low₩8780.00
Year High₩14610.00
Yearly Change66.40%
Revenue
Revenue Per Share₩108511.98
5 Year Revenue Growth-0.02%
10 Year Revenue Growth0.16%
Profit
Gross Profit Margin0.13%
Operating Profit Margin0.05%
Net Profit Margin-0.01%
Stock Price
Day Low$3.63
Day High$3.78
Year Low$3.51
Year High$4.62
Yearly Change31.62%
Revenue
Revenue Per Share$4003.40
5 Year Revenue Growth-0.37%
10 Year Revenue Growth2.91%
Profit
Gross Profit Margin0.19%
Operating Profit Margin0.09%
Net Profit Margin0.07%

Asiana Airlines

ANA

Financial Ratios
P/E ratio-6.92
PEG ratio0.02
P/B ratio1.96
ROE-20.06%
Payout ratio-157.69%
Current ratio0.43
Quick ratio0.38
Cash ratio0.12
Dividend
Dividend Yield-%
5 Year Dividend Yield0.00%
10 Year Dividend Yield0.00%
Asiana Airlines Dividend History
Financial Ratios
P/E ratio2.03
PEG ratio-0.00
P/B ratio0.29
ROE14.65%
Payout ratio0.00%
Current ratio1.63
Quick ratio1.57
Cash ratio0.51
Dividend
Dividend Yield0.01%
5 Year Dividend Yield0.00%
10 Year Dividend Yield0.00%
ANA Dividend History

Asiana Airlines or ANA?

When comparing Asiana Airlines and ANA, different investors may prioritize various metrics based on their investment strategies and goals. So, ask yourself what type of investor you are. This will guide you in determining which metrics are most important for your investment decision between Asiana Airlines and ANA.

Dividend Investors:

Dividend investors look for stable and growing income streams, using dividend metrics to assess potential investments. A company's dividend yield essentially measures the size of its dividend relative to the total market value of the company. Asiana Airlines has a dividend yield of -%, while ANA has a dividend yield of 0.01%. Beyond the yield itself, considering the growth and sustainability of these dividends is also crucial. Asiana Airlines reports a 5-year dividend growth of 0.00% year and a payout ratio of -157.69%. On the other hand, ANA reports a 5-year dividend growth of 0.00% year and a payout ratio of 0.00%.

Value Investors:

Value investors focus on financial metrics to determine a stock's intrinsic value compared to its market value. The Price-to-Earnings (P/E) Ratio links stock price to a company's earnings per share, with Asiana Airlines P/E ratio at -6.92 and ANA's P/E ratio at 2.03. Another crucial valuation metric is the Price-to-Book (P/B) Ratio, which compares stock price with book value per share. Asiana Airlines P/B ratio is 1.96 while ANA's P/B ratio is 0.29.

Growth Investors:

Growth investors prioritize metrics indicative of a company's expansion potential. Focusing on top-line growth, Asiana Airlines has seen a 5-year revenue growth of -0.02%, while ANA's is -0.37%. Return on Equity (ROE) measures how effectively a company uses equity investment to generate earnings, with Asiana Airlines's ROE at -20.06% and ANA's ROE at 14.65%.

Retail Investors:

Retail investors often consider stock affordability and company familiarity. For example, day low prices are ₩9480.00 for Asiana Airlines and $3.63 for ANA. Over the past year, Asiana Airlines's prices ranged from ₩8780.00 to ₩14610.00, with a yearly change of 66.40%. ANA's prices fluctuated between $3.51 and $4.62, with a yearly change of 31.62%. Brand recognition also plays a role, as familiarity with a company can influence investment decisions.

Comparision