Apollo Tyres vs Walker & Dunlop Which Is More Promising?

Apollo Tyres Limited is an Indian multinational company that specializes in manufacturing and selling tires for a variety of vehicles. On the other hand, Walker & Dunlop, Inc. is a commercial real estate finance company based in the United States. Both companies operate in different industries but are publicly traded stocks that are closely monitored by investors. This comparison will analyze the performance and growth potential of Apollo Tyres and Walker & Dunlop stocks, providing insight into their potential for investment.

Apollo Tyres

Walker & Dunlop

Stock Price
Day Low₹448.15
Day High₹478.55
Year Low₹413.95
Year High₹584.90
Yearly Change41.30%
Revenue
Revenue Per Share₹401.41
5 Year Revenue Growth0.30%
10 Year Revenue Growth0.49%
Profit
Gross Profit Margin0.37%
Operating Profit Margin0.17%
Net Profit Margin0.06%
Stock Price
Day Low$105.52
Day High$108.44
Year Low$81.14
Year High$118.19
Yearly Change45.66%
Revenue
Revenue Per Share$31.57
5 Year Revenue Growth0.39%
10 Year Revenue Growth2.41%
Profit
Gross Profit Margin0.79%
Operating Profit Margin0.17%
Net Profit Margin0.09%

Apollo Tyres

Walker & Dunlop

Financial Ratios
P/E ratio18.54
PEG ratio0.19
P/B ratio2.17
ROE12.10%
Payout ratio0.00%
Current ratio0.00
Quick ratio0.00
Cash ratio0.00
Dividend
Dividend Yield1.26%
5 Year Dividend Yield-30.12%
10 Year Dividend Yield0.00%
Apollo Tyres Dividend History
Financial Ratios
P/E ratio37.25
PEG ratio-22.54
P/B ratio2.07
ROE5.55%
Payout ratio92.26%
Current ratio0.27
Quick ratio0.27
Cash ratio0.10
Dividend
Dividend Yield2.42%
5 Year Dividend Yield20.30%
10 Year Dividend Yield0.00%
Walker & Dunlop Dividend History

Apollo Tyres or Walker & Dunlop?

When comparing Apollo Tyres and Walker & Dunlop, different investors may prioritize various metrics based on their investment strategies and goals. So, ask yourself what type of investor you are. This will guide you in determining which metrics are most important for your investment decision between Apollo Tyres and Walker & Dunlop.

Dividend Investors:

Dividend investors look for stable and growing income streams, using dividend metrics to assess potential investments. A company's dividend yield essentially measures the size of its dividend relative to the total market value of the company. Apollo Tyres has a dividend yield of 1.26%, while Walker & Dunlop has a dividend yield of 2.42%. Beyond the yield itself, considering the growth and sustainability of these dividends is also crucial. Apollo Tyres reports a 5-year dividend growth of -30.12% year and a payout ratio of 0.00%. On the other hand, Walker & Dunlop reports a 5-year dividend growth of 20.30% year and a payout ratio of 92.26%.

Value Investors:

Value investors focus on financial metrics to determine a stock's intrinsic value compared to its market value. The Price-to-Earnings (P/E) Ratio links stock price to a company's earnings per share, with Apollo Tyres P/E ratio at 18.54 and Walker & Dunlop's P/E ratio at 37.25. Another crucial valuation metric is the Price-to-Book (P/B) Ratio, which compares stock price with book value per share. Apollo Tyres P/B ratio is 2.17 while Walker & Dunlop's P/B ratio is 2.07.

Growth Investors:

Growth investors prioritize metrics indicative of a company's expansion potential. Focusing on top-line growth, Apollo Tyres has seen a 5-year revenue growth of 0.30%, while Walker & Dunlop's is 0.39%. Return on Equity (ROE) measures how effectively a company uses equity investment to generate earnings, with Apollo Tyres's ROE at 12.10% and Walker & Dunlop's ROE at 5.55%.

Retail Investors:

Retail investors often consider stock affordability and company familiarity. For example, day low prices are ₹448.15 for Apollo Tyres and $105.52 for Walker & Dunlop. Over the past year, Apollo Tyres's prices ranged from ₹413.95 to ₹584.90, with a yearly change of 41.30%. Walker & Dunlop's prices fluctuated between $81.14 and $118.19, with a yearly change of 45.66%. Brand recognition also plays a role, as familiarity with a company can influence investment decisions.

Comparision