Antares Vision vs Flux Power Which Performs Better?

Antares Vision and Flux Power are two companies operating in different sectors of the stock market. Antares Vision specializes in providing cutting-edge vision inspection systems and traceability solutions for pharmaceutical and medical device industries, while Flux Power focuses on developing lithium-ion battery technology for electric forklifts and industrial equipment. Both companies have shown promising growth potential in their respective markets, making them attractive investment options for investors looking to capitalize on the growing demand for advanced technology solutions and sustainable energy sources.

Antares Vision

Flux Power

Stock Price
Day Low€3.00
Day High€3.15
Year Low€1.30
Year High€3.73
Yearly Change187.31%
Revenue
Revenue Per Share€2.82
5 Year Revenue Growth0.54%
10 Year Revenue Growth0.00%
Profit
Gross Profit Margin0.76%
Operating Profit Margin-0.35%
Net Profit Margin-0.56%
Stock Price
Day Low$2.50
Day High$2.81
Year Low$2.30
Year High$5.86
Yearly Change154.78%
Revenue
Revenue Per Share$3.86
5 Year Revenue Growth2.12%
10 Year Revenue Growth1.49%
Profit
Gross Profit Margin0.29%
Operating Profit Margin-0.08%
Net Profit Margin-0.11%

Antares Vision

Flux Power

Financial Ratios
P/E ratio-1.98
PEG ratio-0.02
P/B ratio1.45
ROE-69.26%
Payout ratio0.00%
Current ratio1.60
Quick ratio1.11
Cash ratio0.45
Dividend
Dividend Yield-%
5 Year Dividend Yield0.00%
10 Year Dividend Yield0.00%
Antares Vision Dividend History
Financial Ratios
P/E ratio-5.87
PEG ratio1.01
P/B ratio7.63
ROE-93.72%
Payout ratio0.00%
Current ratio1.10
Quick ratio0.42
Cash ratio0.04
Dividend
Dividend Yield-%
5 Year Dividend Yield0.00%
10 Year Dividend Yield0.00%
Flux Power Dividend History

Antares Vision or Flux Power?

When comparing Antares Vision and Flux Power, different investors may prioritize various metrics based on their investment strategies and goals. So, ask yourself what type of investor you are. This will guide you in determining which metrics are most important for your investment decision between Antares Vision and Flux Power.

Dividend Investors:

Dividend investors look for stable and growing income streams, using dividend metrics to assess potential investments. A company's dividend yield essentially measures the size of its dividend relative to the total market value of the company. Antares Vision has a dividend yield of -%, while Flux Power has a dividend yield of -%. Beyond the yield itself, considering the growth and sustainability of these dividends is also crucial. Antares Vision reports a 5-year dividend growth of 0.00% year and a payout ratio of 0.00%. On the other hand, Flux Power reports a 5-year dividend growth of 0.00% year and a payout ratio of 0.00%.

Value Investors:

Value investors focus on financial metrics to determine a stock's intrinsic value compared to its market value. The Price-to-Earnings (P/E) Ratio links stock price to a company's earnings per share, with Antares Vision P/E ratio at -1.98 and Flux Power's P/E ratio at -5.87. Another crucial valuation metric is the Price-to-Book (P/B) Ratio, which compares stock price with book value per share. Antares Vision P/B ratio is 1.45 while Flux Power's P/B ratio is 7.63.

Growth Investors:

Growth investors prioritize metrics indicative of a company's expansion potential. Focusing on top-line growth, Antares Vision has seen a 5-year revenue growth of 0.54%, while Flux Power's is 2.12%. Return on Equity (ROE) measures how effectively a company uses equity investment to generate earnings, with Antares Vision's ROE at -69.26% and Flux Power's ROE at -93.72%.

Retail Investors:

Retail investors often consider stock affordability and company familiarity. For example, day low prices are €3.00 for Antares Vision and $2.50 for Flux Power. Over the past year, Antares Vision's prices ranged from €1.30 to €3.73, with a yearly change of 187.31%. Flux Power's prices fluctuated between $2.30 and $5.86, with a yearly change of 154.78%. Brand recognition also plays a role, as familiarity with a company can influence investment decisions.

Comparision