Anchorstone vs Celsius Which Performs Better?
Anchorstone and Celsius stocks are two prominent investment options that have captured the attention of investors worldwide. While Anchorstone is known for its stable returns and conservative approach to investing, Celsius stocks are known for their high risk, high reward potential. Both options have their own strengths and weaknesses, making it crucial for investors to carefully analyze their investment goals and risk tolerance before making a decision. In this comparison, we will delve deeper into the intricacies of Anchorstone versus Celsius stocks to help investors make an informed decision.
Anchorstone or Celsius?
When comparing Anchorstone and Celsius, different investors may prioritize various metrics based on their investment strategies and goals. So, ask yourself what type of investor you are. This will guide you in determining which metrics are most important for your investment decision between Anchorstone and Celsius.
Dividend Investors:
Dividend investors look for stable and growing income streams, using dividend metrics to assess potential investments. A company's dividend yield essentially measures the size of its dividend relative to the total market value of the company.
Anchorstone has a dividend yield of -%, while Celsius has a dividend yield of -%. Beyond the yield itself, considering the growth and sustainability of these dividends is also crucial. Anchorstone reports a 5-year dividend growth of 0.00% year and a payout ratio of 0.00%. On the other hand, Celsius reports a 5-year dividend growth of 0.00% year and a payout ratio of 13.56%.
Value Investors:
Value investors focus on financial metrics to determine a stock's intrinsic value compared to its market value. The Price-to-Earnings (P/E) Ratio links stock price to a company's earnings per share, with Anchorstone P/E ratio at -1.21 and Celsius's P/E ratio at 36.59. Another crucial valuation metric is the Price-to-Book (P/B) Ratio, which compares stock price with book value per share. Anchorstone P/B ratio is 3.07 while Celsius's P/B ratio is 17.54.
Growth Investors:
Growth investors prioritize metrics indicative of a company's expansion potential. Focusing on top-line growth, Anchorstone has seen a 5-year revenue growth of -0.87%, while Celsius's is 15.30%. Return on Equity (ROE) measures how effectively a company uses equity investment to generate earnings, with Anchorstone's ROE at -169.47% and Celsius's ROE at 20.74%.
Retail Investors:
Retail investors often consider stock affordability and company familiarity. For example, day low prices are HK$0.04 for Anchorstone and $30.63 for Celsius. Over the past year, Anchorstone's prices ranged from HK$0.02 to HK$0.08, with a yearly change of 382.35%. Celsius's prices fluctuated between $25.23 and $99.62, with a yearly change of 294.85%. Brand recognition also plays a role, as familiarity with a company can influence investment decisions.