Ackermans & Van Haaren vs AMP

Ackermans & Van Haaren and AMP stocks are two prominent companies in the investment world, each with its own unique strengths and strategies. Ackermans & Van Haaren is a diversified group with a focus on long-term value creation, while AMP stocks is a leading wealth management and financial services company. Both companies have garnered significant attention from investors and analysts alike, making them important players in the global financial market. This comparison will delve into their respective performance, financial standing, and market outlook to provide insights for potential investors.

Ackermans & Van Haaren

AMP

Stock Price
Day Low€188.80
Day High€190.40
Year Low€135.70
Year High€193.70
Yearly Change42.74%
Revenue
Revenue Per Share€173.43
5 Year Revenue Growth0.18%
10 Year Revenue Growth9.00%
Profit
Gross Profit Margin0.25%
Operating Profit Margin0.09%
Net Profit Margin0.08%
Stock Price
Day Low$0.66
Day High$0.87
Year Low$0.58
Year High$0.87
Yearly Change50.00%
Revenue
Revenue Per Share$1.44
5 Year Revenue Growth-0.67%
10 Year Revenue Growth-0.89%
Profit
Gross Profit Margin1.12%
Operating Profit Margin0.37%
Net Profit Margin0.03%

Ackermans & Van Haaren

AMP

Financial Ratios
P/E ratio14.54
PEG ratio0.15
P/B ratio1.24
ROE8.63%
Payout ratio25.95%
Current ratio0.71
Quick ratio0.66
Cash ratio0.10
Dividend
Dividend Yield1.25%
5 Year Dividend Yield7.10%
10 Year Dividend Yield6.38%
Ackermans & Van Haaren Dividend History
Financial Ratios
P/E ratio29.20
PEG ratio0.19
P/B ratio0.95
ROE3.19%
Payout ratio103.31%
Current ratio0.06
Quick ratio0.06
Cash ratio0.06
Dividend
Dividend Yield3.22%
5 Year Dividend Yield0.00%
10 Year Dividend Yield0.00%
AMP Dividend History

Ackermans & Van Haaren or AMP?

When comparing Ackermans & Van Haaren and AMP, different investors may prioritize various metrics based on their investment strategies and goals. So, ask yourself what type of investor you are. This will guide you in determining which metrics are most important for your investment decision between Ackermans & Van Haaren and AMP.

Dividend Investors:

Dividend investors look for stable and growing income streams, using dividend metrics to assess potential investments. A company's dividend yield essentially measures the size of its dividend relative to the total market value of the company. Ackermans & Van Haaren has a dividend yield of 1.25%, while AMP has a dividend yield of 3.22%. Beyond the yield itself, considering the growth and sustainability of these dividends is also crucial. Ackermans & Van Haaren reports a 5-year dividend growth of 7.10% year and a payout ratio of 25.95%. On the other hand, AMP reports a 5-year dividend growth of 0.00% year and a payout ratio of 103.31%.

Value Investors:

Value investors focus on financial metrics to determine a stock's intrinsic value compared to its market value. The Price-to-Earnings (P/E) Ratio links stock price to a company's earnings per share, with Ackermans & Van Haaren P/E ratio at 14.54 and AMP's P/E ratio at 29.20. Another crucial valuation metric is the Price-to-Book (P/B) Ratio, which compares stock price with book value per share. Ackermans & Van Haaren P/B ratio is 1.24 while AMP's P/B ratio is 0.95.

Growth Investors:

Growth investors prioritize metrics indicative of a company's expansion potential. Focusing on top-line growth, Ackermans & Van Haaren has seen a 5-year revenue growth of 0.18%, while AMP's is -0.67%. Return on Equity (ROE) measures how effectively a company uses equity investment to generate earnings, with Ackermans & Van Haaren's ROE at 8.63% and AMP's ROE at 3.19%.

Retail Investors:

Retail investors often consider stock affordability and company familiarity. For example, day low prices are €188.80 for Ackermans & Van Haaren and $0.66 for AMP. Over the past year, Ackermans & Van Haaren's prices ranged from €135.70 to €193.70, with a yearly change of 42.74%. AMP's prices fluctuated between $0.58 and $0.87, with a yearly change of 50.00%. Brand recognition also plays a role, as familiarity with a company can influence investment decisions.

Comparision